On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Review Essay Example

On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Review Paper Essay on On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Lets cut ones way in the all around! Perhaps these words can put the theme of the work, because they frequently uttered by one of the main characters and reflects the attitude of the heroes to the world around them. The plot is not intricate. A couple of guys Sal Paradise (on behalf of the narrator) and Dean Moriarty throughout the book romp from one end of America to the other and back again. Throughout all their journeys surround incredible adventures and mishaps, which reflect the inner world of the characters and their attitude to life. The work is certainly worth considering. Reading it, however, enter into the role of the main characters. Rather to my main character was Dean Moriarty and it was his actions, speech, emotions caused some trepidation in his heart. There is a desire to drop everything and go in any direction, nablyadaya everything around, talking to everyone, forget about any framework in which we are driving social norms and morals, breathing life! Move, move, move! We will write a custom essay sample on On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Review specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on On the Road. Maggie Cassidy. The essay Review specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer The truth is after some time come to mind thoughts about the reverse side of the issue. Such a life is meaningless in terms of the benefit. Benefits that can bring into our world. And in the end, this life can get bored. The story shows the life of the characters in the context of several years. Dean manages to marry, divorce, re-marriage, to have children. One thing remains unchanged. Feeling in his soul a certain loneliness, loneliness that despite the everyday, every minute chat with people, no one can fill And he again embarks on a road

Juvenile Rights essays

Juvenile Rights essays Law constituting various sets of rules and regulations survives to date and came into existence in order to safeguard the rights of its people, its followers. However, how these laws are formulated and used in order to defend the innocent and punish the guilty still depends largely on judges that preside over cases. Often, it has been observed that these laws are trampled as well as treated according to the free will of the courts thereby affecting the defendant and influencing the decision of the arbiter. However, for the public's benefit and to further help the people (who are charged with crimes and are sentenced not according to what they deserve) as much as possible, our legal system is divided into various stratum based on the authority and power each layer of the legal system enjoys. On the same account, the Supreme Court of the United States enjoys an immense amount of authority and therefore plays a major role in recognizing the loopholes in the system thereby shouldering massive moral, legal and social responsibility. Hence, the Supreme Court of the United States has made some of the highly significant legal decisions thereby greatly impacting the right of both the children and the adults charged with major or minor crimes. However, legal rights and rules for adults and juveniles are different. Therefore, in California, as in all states, there exists an entirely separate court system for persons under the age of 18, who are known as juveniles or minors. The primary reason to establish these juvenile courts is to provide thorough assistance to the children that are charged with some minor or major offense but who can be successfully reformed through rigorous counseling, adequate education and guidance, rather than punishing them in the adult criminal justice system. Nonetheless, history unfolding the juvenile cases reveals that many a times juveniles have been deprived ...

Luxury Marketing- Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Luxury Marketing- - Essay Example The GDP per capita as on 2012 is $49,000 that positions it at rank 16 as compared to other countries2. 1.2 Demographic UAE is considered to have the world’s third best demographic profile after Qatar and Macau (China). According to the reports of the International Labour Organization a quarter of the population is estimated to be 4.8 million and is categorised under non-working age who are dependent either on their family members or on support from the government3. 1.3 Social and Cultural After Abu Dhabi started to export oil, the society of the country also started to transform. Emiratis are traditionally conservative but UAE is considered to one of the most liberal countries in the Gulf. Other believes and cultures are tolerated especially in Dubai4. 1.4 Technology UAE has spent about $5 billion (Dh 18.36 billion) as an investment towards technological upgradation. The main aim behind doing this was to make UAE the fastest growing region of the world in spending towards info rmation technology5. 1.5 Political Politically the region remains authoritarian. Until 2006 it remained as the as the only country that do not have elected bodies. In 2012 restriction was introduced related to usage of internet. However the authority of UAE tries to reduce the dependency on oil export and diversify the economy by creating boom in the tourism, construction and business sector6. 2. Industry Analysis 2.1 Overview Fragrance Foundation Arabia has claimed that a significant growth has been marked by the regional and global fragrance industry and is seen to get almost double from US$ 17 billion in the year 2010 to US$ 33.5 billion by 2015. More specifically a research by Euromonitor International stated that UAE has witnessed a high-end sales growth of signature products at a compounded annual growth rate of 5.4% and reach AED663.5 million by 2014. The sale in the mass fragrance for the same period is also expected to be AED247.9 million7. This is a clear indication of tha t the market of UAE has a preference for luxury goods and more specifically high-end products. 2.2 Entry Barriers The major entry barriers are the competitors operating in the market like Clive Christian, Tom Ford and Yves Saint Laurent who are some of the prominent players in the oud-based fragrance market. In UAE there are 3000 brands operating8. 2.3 Trends The current trends suggests that previously about 70% of the business was dominated by oud-based perfume but now it has reduced to only 30% and rest are occidental perfumes9. As per the survey record of UAE Ministry of Economy the per month average household income of the residents is AED18,248.60. The report has also revealed that the AED11,241.20 is the average household expenditure of the resident in one month with most of the income spent on drinks and food10. The age structure of UAE is 20.6% of the total population is between the age group of 0-14 years (male 577,599 and female 551,346), 13.8% is between the age group of 15-24 years (male 449,258 and female 306,410), 61.5% is between the age group of 22-54 years (male 2,570,054 and female 798,070), 3.1% is between the age group of 55-64 years (male 127,569 and female 40,996) and only 1% is above 65 years (male 33,481 and female 19,189) as on 201311. 2.4 Success factors Lifestyle of the people has changed. Now they want to look good and in fact smell good. Strong economy has made the region and the fragrance sector more lucrative. Growth in the expat population also plays a major role in

What is the role of Social Media in fashion today Term Paper

What is the role of Social Media in fashion today - Term Paper Example For many people, dress code is an expression of identity, personality, choice and faith. It can also profoundly affect an individual spiritual self and help out someone connect to the inward self hence realizing self-identity. Marco Pallis, the author on fashion, describes the importance and meaningfulness between dress and self identity, identity and social status. Additionally he explores how clothing rates among the most significant but least evaluated sites of colonization. He is mostly interested examining clothing as a constituent of self identity, social status and spirituality identity. He writes that ‘of the numerous issues an individual practice in the quest of earthly vocations, there are none, conceivably, that are so intimately attached with the whole personality as the dress ones wears (Pallis, 2005). The foremost issue that Pallis observes is how clothing can significantly transforms an individual appearance and even the facial looks. It is everyone effort to look appealing in front of the peers, colleagues or even in the eyes of the society on any occasion be it a business or just a mere visit. What an individual look has a great impact on how the rest and the society in general perceive that person. The image impacts on well-being of a person as perceived by others. In extreme cases, dress code can lead to a lowered self-esteem vis-Ã  -vis. It is, therefore, of at most importance if one looks appealing. There are many factors that can be used to explain the reason behind the fashions. Nonetheless, we cannot point to any individual factor as the reason why fashion exists amidst us. In one particular case, advance in social technology makes the information to travel fast than it was back then in the earlier days (Yerima, 2004). There is profound exchange of ideas, cultures, and fashions change within short period of time. A trending fashion will be all over the globe courtesy to

Ethical objectivism and Kantian Ethics ar arguments to ethical Essay

Ethical objectivism and Kantian Ethics ar arguments to ethical relativism - Essay Example Even in the contemporary world there are a strong amount of arguments in favor of ethical relativism. Some of the most prominent such arguments are advanced by anthropologists whose job it is to go into a region and develop ethnographical research regarding a culture. While these perspectives are at times convincing specifically about more grey areas issues, on a large-scale it’s clear that they are shortsighted. When extended to universal aspects of all cultures, adopting an approach of ethical relativism could potentially be calamitous for humanity. In these regards, it is possible that one cultural paradigm conflicts with the subsistence of another culture. It follows that when one’s cultural paradigm infringes on the rights and existence of another cultural paradigm that there needs to be a means of further establishing ethical responsibility. A great number of ethical theories exist in contradistinction to the ethical relativist model, with the Kantian approach to ethics the most convincing. Kant argues that, â€Å"All moral statements should be general laws, which apply to everyone under and circumstances† (â€Å"Kant†). This notion, referred to as the categorical imperative, is the understanding that an ethical action must be that can be applied in a universal way; as such, this precludes many activities that would otherwise be condoned under an ethical relativist perspective. Another prominent notion within Kantian ethics is the notion of moral duty. Moral duty argues that an individual has the duty to obey innate moral laws (â€Å"Kant’s Moral Philosophy†). The articulation of ethical responsibility as rooted in innate moral laws characteristic of all humanity is antithetical to moral relativism. Rather ethics as functioning subjectively, they are innate and universal to all cultures. Ulti mately, adopting this Kantian is model is superior to the relativist approach as the former

Stronger Case Antigone Or Creon Philosophy Essay

Stronger Case Antigone Or Creon Philosophy Essay At the centre of The Burial at Thebes is the contest between the belief that the gods should form the basis of moral behaviour in the state, presented by Antigone and Creons case that the king can define what is correct behaviour. I shall go through the text and pick out passages that are relevant to the cases presented. My conclusion will be based on which case has the most support throughout the text, remains the most consistent and also the desire of the protagonists to see their views through to the end. Antigone presents her case during the plays prologue. She believes Creons general order forbidding the burial of Polyneices is morally wrong and states clearly that she is going to bury his body (Heaney, 2004, p5Â  [1]Â  ). It is important to note that women played a central role in the religious conventions of funeral rites and practices (Hardwirck, 2008, p195), and these events contrasted with the usual exclusion of women from Greek public life. This issue is raised by Ismene who describers herself and Antigone as two women on our own who we must do as were told (p5). It is made clear in this passage that Antigone knows she will be sentenced to death for defying Creon, something she has not intention of covering up. For Antigone burying her brother is a matter of showing honour to the dead (the ones youll be with the longest) and her belief that the gods will be proud of me (p6). The importance of reverence to the gods is a central theme in the play and Antigones case is strengthened by her invocation to them and the importance of giving the dead an appropriate burial. Before Creon has stated his case he has it strengthened by the Chorus who describe him as right for this city at this time (p9) at the end of the parados. Given that one function of the Chorus is to provide moral comment this is notable backing. Creon case, that Polyneices, a traitor, an anti- Theban Theban (p10), should not be buried is stated during his first rhesis. By giving this order Creon is not only willing to sacrifice family ties but emphasising loyalty to the state. The security of, and loyalty to, the state is the at the heart of Creons case. His opening speech is an extended metaphor in which the state is a ship that he led to calmer waters (p8), and those that stood by him a loyal crew. Creon emphasises the words friend and family (p9) to strengthen his belief that personal loyalty must always give way to patriotic duty (p9). After the war with Argos it makes sense that Creon would want to install a sense of unity by honouring those that stood up for Thebes and highlight the importance of patriotic duty. Creon uses the gods to back up his case. For him they kept Thebes safe during the war with Argos and later on describes as preposterous the idea that the gods have had a hand'(p14) in the burial of the traitor Polyneices. Creon believes his case here is strong for it would be illogical that the gods would side with Polyneices given that the city [is] under their protection (p14). If Creons view of the gods is correct, then is case his strengthened but if, as the Chorus suggests, the gods have sided with Antigone than her belief that they will be proud of her appears to be true. Another theme Creon raises is his belief that dissent to his rule is money orientated. It warps minds and generally corrupts (p15) and is, in Creons mind, the reason why the guard has not apprehended the burier of Polyneices. When the guard suggests that the judge has misjudged everything (p16) he emphasises judge and mis when he speaks, giving an added sense of foreboding to his words. This is added to when he describes waiting for whatever plague.. the gods were sending (p19) when capturing Antigone. The theme of money and plague are later returned to and help destroy not only Creons case, but also himself. Antigones acceptance of death is highlighted when the guard describes how she showed no signs of panic (p20) and admitted breaking Creons law. The following agon gives each protagonist the opportunity to strengthen their cases. Antigone does this by emphasising the edict is not the law of Zeus and that she follows original, god-given laws (p20). By invoking the gods again Antigone gives her case the backing of those that all in Thebes will worship long after Creon ceases to rule. Creon challenges Antigone when he asks if religion dictates the same for loyal and disloyal (p24). Here he is supporting his belief that the gods value the security of Thebes and would not want to be joined by a traitor. When he would states he would know his enemy in the underworld (p24) Creon appears to be stating that the afterlife is a a continuation of this life, and the battles he has fought; whereas for Antigone the next world is a place where past sins matter not and all are equal and thus that the gods are less concerned with mortal actions than Creon. With such differing views on the will of the gods the case that is the strongest will be the case that pleases the gods the most. The third episode sticmythia with Haemon gives Creon the opportunity to restate and strengthen his case which he does with his opening speech. Here he restates the importance of discipline and obedience to the state; when those go cities, homes and armies collapse (p15). Again Creon is stating the importance of stability as he did with his first speech and again he states that he expects his family to observe the discipline I expect from every citizen (p30). It is hard to not respect Creons views here and the Chorus does just this when they state the he seems to make good sense (p31). By the end of the third episode the case laid out in Creons opening speech is brought to the fore. He has sacrificed his son for what he perceives to be the security of the state and has proven that patriotic duty has triumphed over personal loyalty (p10). By relenting now Creon would destroy his case; Antigone has to die for Creons case to remain strong and Creon shows that he is willing to accept the consequences of his actions when he tells the Chorus that Haemon can do his worst then (p35). Creon should have remembered the Choruss warning that anyone who overstep[s] what the city allows risks being put beyond the pale (p16). Haemon tells Creon that People here in Thebes dont seem to think that Antigone is a danger. Creons response that rulers[are] meant to be in charge should strengthen his case but it doesnt the Chorus also warned of the dangers of treating the lawas his own word (p33). The grace with which Antigone accepts her fate throughout the fourth episode strengthens her case. The Chorus believes that Antigone goes with her head held high and because you were noble (p37 39). It is difficult to not be moved when she says I close my eye on the sun. I turn my back on the light (p39) with emphasises on close, eye, sun, turn, back and light. Antigone remains consistent and sees her case through to the end. In her final speech she reminds the reader that she has been punished for a reverence that was right (p41), that is a reverence to Hades, to the dead, even if they are enemies of the state and the duty of families to mourn their loved ones. By this point Creon can present his case as being successful. The state has won, and someone that has shown a lack of loyalty has been punished as the law demanded. Despite this his case isnt as strong as it should be. The Chorus who who at first supported Creon and who he relied upon to be agents of the law (p11) have turned against him, and the warnings put to him earlier have still not been dealt with. The entry of Tiresias brings the end of Creons case. The plague the guard alluded too has become tangible, and the corpse of Polyneices is where the contagion starts (p44). The king has been warned that the gods are revolted (p44) but when told that he can undo his mistake his first response is to accuse Tiresias of being bribed and his second sight.. well warped (p45). When Creon does relent it is because he has taken Antigones view that we should keep the established law (p48). This is a complete u-turn that sees Creon accept Antigones case and proves beyond doubt that her case is the stronger of the two. It is too little too late, Antigone is dead in her wedding dress with her beloved Haemon by her side, his mother and Creons wife Eurydice soon joins them in the underworld. Creon is destroyed; he want(s) to hurry death (p55) but can not. Antigone accepted the consequences of her actions but Creon has courted calamity (p56) and must accept the unknown to come. Using the criteria stated above I can only conclude that Antigone has been given the stronger case. If the play finished at the end of fourth episode it would be a hard decision but I would have sided with Antigone following her heartbreaking speeches. I would, as a modern reader, also be swayed by the belief that the state should not interfere in the religious practices of families and should not overturn centuries old traditions for political reasons. Creons taking on of Antigones view and the Choruss final moral comment, that leaders should always rule by the gods and reverence them (p56), makes it impossible to draw a conclusion different to mine.

Narrative Essay :: My Grandpa

"Hello," I stated as I hopped through the door to my grandparent's home without even a knock. My grandma looked up from the book she was reading in her cozy corner chair, "Well, hello there" "Where is grandpa?" I asked as I leaned down to brush my lips across the soft wrinkled cheek of my elderly grandma. "Who's there?" a familiar deep, rough voice sounded from the next room. Smiling I skipped through the kitchen and into a long dimly lit room filled with bookcases, couches, a dining room table and a grand piano. My grandpa, across the room, was surrounded by music stands and piles of sheet music. His trusty violin was in one hand and the long wooden bow with the horse hair strings, that I was always warned never to touch, was in the other. As I walked toward the figure across the room, I noticed his full head of snowy white hair glowing in the dark room. Over his short stocky body hung a green dress shirt and a fuzzy cardigan sweater. He wore slacks held up awkwardly by a belt allowing his small potbelly to hang over it. His face hardly showed the years of worry and stress, but his white bushy eyebrows and growing second chin showed his old age. His smile greeted me. As I drew close to him, his aging arms reached out and wrapped around my body pulling me into a warm loving hug. As he released me from the hug, I said, "Grandpa, I learned a new song I want you to hear." I plopped down on the hard piano bench, and my fingers flowed over the keys. My foot pumped the cold pedal, and the room was magically filled with tones, one after another slowly warming the room. Looking up at my grandfather's soft, blue eyes I saw him crack a smile and nod with encouragement. Soon his violin found its way to its familiar spot between my grandpa's shoulder and his unshaven chin. He swayed slightly as his arm moved the bow across the strings of the violin producing a harmony to the melody I was performing. With a long last note, we both dropped our hands to our sides allowing the music, which had just filled the room with its thick tone, to abruptly end. The room was left in a dead silence, frozen for a brief period of time, as we recovered from the intensity of the piece.

Its Catalysts and Unhealthy Results Essay

The body has acted as the playground of beauty. Many individuals have experimented with their bodies in order for them to look and feel good, mainly influenced by media and backed up by vanity. However, this constant experimentation has created an unusual obsession towards making their bodies look better. False perception of beauty has created an unlikely habit which seems to cost some individuals’ lives. False Imagery of the body seems to have been influenced by media, has also created a â€Å"role model†, and resulted in unhealthy eating habits. Western Media covers almost the entire world and accompanied by the internet, their reach might continue to grow. Western television shows, movies, magazines, and other related media conveyed their perception of beauty. Western media has dominated much of the third world countries’ local media; hence, the influences of Western media on beauty can be most evident within this group. The result was a distortion of their o perception of beauty. Here is a good example coming from the reading: â€Å"Fijians revere a body†¦features that show that the body is strong, hard-working, and healthy†¦Thinness†¦was seen as some kind of social loss or neglect† (McClelland par. 7-8). This was the Fijian’s original perception of beauty when their government announced the installation of a television network which included western programs. Years later, this perception suddenly changed. However, the influence of western media acts only as step one to adopting the changes in perception. Step two is when the individual accepts these changes. Hence, it naturally falls as the individual’s choice. On the other hand, western media has still created a false imagery of beauty which dominated the other culture’s perception on the subject. This may have resulted to the creation of a greater rift between two or more ethnic groups. The United States boasts a diverse population which can be separated into different ethnic groups—white Americans somewhat making up the majority. Whites—especially women—dominate western media; hence, this enabled them to be the â€Å"role models† in terms of beauty. Among the minority groups, many have tried to make their selves look like their favorite celebrities and personalities from the western media; trying to look thin and white which for them, defined sexy. They simply felt insecure with the way they look and how others reacted: â€Å"†¦put white baby powder on my cheeks just to look white,† which was said by a 19-year old South African, East Indian girl (McClelland par. 11). Insecurity on her God-given physique has made her act this way. The whites may seem to be the perfect â€Å"role models. † However, there are a lot of potential role models from the minor ethnic groups that can be equally beautiful, sexy, and sophisticated when compared to the white role model. Members of the minority need a role model of their own in order to avoid the mishaps of eating disorders and other illnesses—paranoia, insecurity, and vanity are just some. Unhealthy eating habits are a result of a person’s insecurity with his or her own body—usual eating disorder patients were women. There are two types of eating disorders: (1) Anorexia (self-starvation) and (2) Bulimia (induced vomiting). Both were equally regarded as a dangerous habit, especially the latter. From some distorted perspective, many still perform such acts in order to look good—being thin is considered sexy. A woman performing these acts may appear sexy, which does not seem to wrong. However, the sacrifice that she had to make can be seen as an act of desperation. Not only that, these two habits can damage the body’s system which can be fatal when not cured. The influence of the western media seems too powerful to counter-influence it. The ethnic disparities may continue to grow and the anorexic and bulimic might remain the same. However, I believe that there is still a way to change the habits of the old and replace these distorted images with ones that would not affect the way people live. Works Cited McClelland, Susan. (August 14, 2000). â€Å"Distorted Images. † Maclean’s.

Comparing and contrasting Anthem for doomed youth and Attack Essays

Comparing and contrasting Anthem for doomed youth and Attack Essays Comparing and contrasting Anthem for doomed youth and Attack Paper Comparing and contrasting Anthem for doomed youth and Attack Paper Essay Topic: Anthem Poetry We have been studying two poems, the Anthem For Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen, and Attack by Seigfried Sassoon. These poems are both anti war poems and were written during the time of the First World War. Owens poem is about the lack of appropriate burials and respect to the dead soldiers. The other poem, Attack, is a narrative about an attack on the British soldiers. In some ways the poems are very similar. As I mentioned before both are anti war. I can tell this from the way they describe people dying. In Owens poem the men are described as, Dying like cattle. In Sassoons poem they are said to have, Grey muttering faces masked with fear. Death is inevitable. In each poem the poets suggest that the war is one sided, that they are doomed and they flounder. Both of the poems make me stop and wonder where god is in all of this horror. The only choirs the soldiers have are the demented choirs of wailing shells. Both contain a lot of poetic devices. The most extensively used one is alliteration. This helps us to almost hear what is happening. For example in the Anthem, Owen describes the gunfire as a rapid rattle. For a similar effect in Sassoons poem you can almost hear the slow ticking of a clock when he uses the alliteration time ticks. There is plenty of onomatopoeia and graphic description, so we almost feel as if we are there on the battlefield. Words like monstrous and menacing give us pictures of the battle scene, whilst words like roars and stuttering provide the sound effects. However, the poems do have their differences. Attack is more factual than the Anthem and the emotion doesnt come until the end when you can hear, as if your right next to him in the trench, him cry out, Jesu make it stop! In Anthem you can sense Wilfred Owens anger all the way through by just allowing yourselves to hear the bitterness in which he asks, almost sarcastically, What passing bells for these who die as cattle? The form of the poems is very different. Sassoons is set out all in one verse whereas Owens is set out as a sonnet with an octave and a sestet. This leads me on to showing you the difference in the overall content of the poems. Attack is about just one incident, exactly what the title suggests. It is basically a short story about an attack. Owens is split up into two scenarios. One takes place on the battlefield with the gunfire and bombs. The other takes us back home to what it was like for the wives and girlfriends of the young men in the war. Secondly Anthem is a discussion, which involves the reader, by describing the terrible conditions and also suggesting that this is there funeral, What passing bells for these who die as cattle? /Only the monstrous anger of the guns/Only the stuttering rifles rapid rattle. The poetic devices are not always the same. Firstly, the rhyming pattern is different. Whereas in Owens it follows the traditional of ending in a rhyming couplet of a sonnet Sassoons is very unusual, AACDBEDEDGGD. Owen uses rhetorical questions to speak out to us, What candles may be held to speed them all? Sassoon uses direct speech and this only comes in on the very last line where he cries out O Jesu make it stop! I think that Wilfred Owens poem is better, I feel the anger that grips you all the way through, although its awful to find that it ends so quickly because I would have liked it to go on forever. However I do like the final line of Sassoons poem when he shows emotion as it seems as though he is really there at the scene.

buy custom Criminal Law essay

buy custom Criminal Law essay Q1 The sixth Amendment of the US constitution is the section of the US Bill of Rights which sets forth rights connected to unlawful trials. The Supreme Court has employed the safeguards of this amendment to the states by way of Due Process Article of the 14th Amendments. The sixth amendment contains 5 principles that impact on the rights of a defendant in an illicit trial: the right to a speedy and public trial, the right to be tried by a fair jury, the right to be conversant with the charges, the right to confront and call eyewitness, and the right to a lawyer. The right of a needy defendant in a criminal tryout to the support of counsel, which is assured by the Sixth Amendment as made valid to the States by the 14th, Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, is not directed by the cluster of the crime or by whether or not a jury audition is needed. No accused might be dispossessed of their freedom as the result of any scandalous prosecution, whether criminal or misconduct, in which they are, disallowed the assistance of the counsel. In this scenario, the Supreme Court of Florida made a mistake in holding that supplicant, a penniless who was judged for a crime punishable by incarceration up to six months, a $ 1,000 fine, or both, and given a ninety day lockup sentence, had no right to court-appointed advocate, under the pretext that the right expands only to trials for non-trivial offenses punishable by more than 6 months behind bars. Argersinger was convicted for carrying a secret weapon, a crime punishable by a jail term of up to 6 months, $ 1,000 fine, or both. Impoverished, he was tried without an attorney by the jury, found culpable, and jailed for 90 days. Argersinger went ahead to petition in the Florida Supreme Court hinting that he was denied of his 6th Amendment right to attorney, (Miller, 2006). The court overruled his claim. The United States Supreme Court Overturned the case. It unmitigated Gideon v. Wainwright (1963), asserting that lacking an informed and intelligent waiver, not any persons can be incarcerated for any offense, whether clustered as trivial, misconduct, or criminal, unless they are represented by an attorney during a trial. In agreement, Justice Powell articulated concern that most verdicts would importantly trouble the already jam-packed criminal justice structure and would permit those fined rather than imprisoned to present fair defense challenges. Gerald Gault, aged fifteen was put behind bars with Ronald Lewis, a pal to his son, on the eighth of the six of 1964. Neither of Geralds parents was present when the police took him away. Not even a notice was left behind, and had no idea Gerald had been taken to a juvenile confinement center. The police took action on the basis of a neighbors grumble that Gerald has made obscene sentiments to her by way of telephone. So when Geralds mother learnt about his son being taken to a juvenile confinement center, she went right there only to be told the hearing was scheduled for the following day. During the hearing, Geralds appellant was not present and there was no formal report regarding the facts of the allegations. An appeal had been demanded by the deputy trial officer; however, no notice of this petition was given to Geralds family.Long story short, Geralds case had no basis, it was simply based on a few past occurrences, neither of which involved an inquiry or an official allegation. One occurrence involved Gerald stealing a baseball glove from his friend and lying to the law enforcers about it. Another occurrence involved Gerald making irritant phone calls. Q3 The 5th amendment to the US Constitution promises to all people the concessions against forced self-incrimination. In the case involving Miranda v. Arizona, the U.S Supreme Court translated the 5th amendment to require a particular cluster of bureaucratic defenses that police officers should follow to defend effectively each persons 5th amendment rights. The Miranda defenses demand that before an accused custodial cross-examination, government officials should inform the indicted that they have the right to remain silent; that any of his statements might be used against him in a successive criminal action; that he has the right to confer with attorney; and that if he can be able to pay for the legal representative, the court will hire an lawyer to represent him. The authority may not employ an assertion obtained in contravention of these Miranda defenses to prove the guilt of a defendant. An indicters right to advocate at pretrial illegal schedules safeguards that person from present ing a coerced or instinctive affirmation. The right to attorney guarantees that the government affords assistance to an accused in dealing with the criminal process and also safeguards an indicted from involuntary self-incrimination. In each of the scenarios, a defendant who was not liberated to depart police detention was interrogated by law enforcement personnel, detectives, or a prosecuting lawyers exclusive of being advised that he had the 5th Amendment right to decline to respond to questions, that any account made could be applied against him during trial, and that he hand the 6th Amendment right to consult with a legal representative at any time during the cross-examination, even if he had previously made conscious declarations or reacted to questions. In the named scenario, Miranda was charged with kidnapping an molesting sexually on the third month of 1963. After being arraigned in court, he was identified by the wounded, then coerced to stand, chained, in a room for several hours while cross-examined by detectives. Arizona State bickered that Miranda had a perpetual police record and was informed of the processes applied to acquire his assertion. They in addition argued, he had exhibited acumen in compe tently negotiating with police, and had signed the admission eagerly. Under Arizona law the prosecution was fit, if the judgment was scrapped off, it would set a model that would interfere with futuristic police cross-examinations. In the end, Arizona Supreme Court upheld the lower jurys ruling, allowing Mirandas judgment to stand. Supreme Court Decision The Warren Court had in the past ruled, in Escobedo v. Illinois, 378 United States 478 (1964), when a law enforcement cross-examination is no longer a holistic investigation regarding an unsolved felony, although focuses on a fastidious suspect, a defendant cannot be disallowed his legitimate right to help of attorney. The Escobedo verdict in connection with Gideon v. Wainwright, (1963) and Mapp v. Ohio (1961) had put in place, fundamentals of impartiality, specification structured to secure the constitutional rights of the accused. In Escobedos case, the Court asserted, the accused had the right to attorney as soon as he or she was known as a suspect in a scandalous cross-examination. The Miranda verdict lessened the threshold for determining when a person could invoke legitimate defense using the right to leave trail, which entails any time an individual no longer had the liberty to willingly take themselves out of police custody. In a slim 5-4 vote, the court ruled to reverse Mira ndas belief under the pretext that he had not been rightly informed of his legitimate liberties. The typed waiver below the supposition was held to be inadequate and entailed a legal waiver of rights. Failure to guarantee the suspect understood his legitimate rights was breach of the fourteenth Amendment Due Process Article. Question 5 Seizures are subject to the demands of the 4th Amendments, although the courts have tagged along the legal system in maintaining the liberty of law enforcers to arraign a person in detention without a warrant if they have a probable cause to assume that the suspect to be arrested has been involved in a crime and wrong doing in their presence. The likely cause is, of course, analogous standard needed to be realized in the issuance of an arrest warrant, and should be justified by circumstances subsisting before to the law enforcers stop, what is unraveled thereafter not sufficing to determine retroactively logical cause,(Spawn, 2003). There are, nevertheless, occurrences when a law enforcers suspicions will have been roused by a persons conduct or manner, although probable cause for putting such an individual under apprehension will be inadequate. In Terry v. Ohio, 186 the Court almost generally sanctioned an on-the-street cross examination by a law enforcer which entails patting down the theme of the cross-examination for arms. In a case that involved, Sibron v. New York, 392 United States, 40 (1968) after law enforcers observed suspect speak with various known narcotics enthusiasts, he approached him and put his hand in the suspects pocket, hence unraveling narcotics; this was impermissible since he lacked a logical rational for frisk and as such his search over-stretched tolerable extent of a weapons frisk Adams v. Williams. The court also ruled that the Mendenhall free-to-leave inquiry was misplaced in the context of a law enforcer sweep of a bus, although a logically altered view tactic still governed. In carrying out a bus seizure, with a view of detecting illicit drugs and their dispatch riders, law enforcers plainly board a bus during a stopover at a terminal and requested to inspect tickets and also luggage of a few commuters. The Court in this regard did not center its attention on whether the seizure had transpired, as adherence to the Hodari D strategy would have demanded, but rather implied that the appropriate cross-examination is whether a logical person would be at liberty to decline the law enforcers demands or else halt the encounter. Q6 Since the Supreme Courts ruling in the case involving Miranda v. Arizona, the police have been demanded to read suspects their rights, prior to carrying out a custodial cross-examination. Whereas everyone is nearly memorable with Miranda rights, there are various wide ranging and significant miscomprehensions regarding the Miranda rights and how they impact a criminal case. If one is arrested or are facing misdemeanor charges, a criminal protection lawyer can assist substantiate rights to you. The basis of the Miranda verdict is the need that police officers counsel suspects of particular legitimate rights prior to carrying out a custodial cross-examination. This process is widely referred to as reading your rights. The proclamation of rights is analogous to most Americans, even to those that have not had any contact with the unlawful justice structure, (Spawn, 2003). The Miranda warnings say that, an individual has the right to maintain silence, and that anything uttered can be used against a person in a court of law. It goes ahead to assert that an individual has the liberty to consult a lawyer and have an attorney represent suspects during questioning time. In the event that a suspect cannot be able to meet legal services, the court can have an attorney appointed to represent them if they deem fit. If a suspect prefers to discuss with the law enforcers, they have the right to terminate the discussion if need be. The subsequent article asserts that the suspect is conversant with, and comprehends the liberties and is making a voluntary verdict to discuss with the police. Even though most police officers follow this shape with precision, courts have allowed diverse lingua that competently relays these liberties and determines intelligent waiver of those liberties. During a custodial cross-examination, the police are mainly demanded to read to suspects their liberties in a custodial cross examination scenario. What entails a custodial interrogation has been the question of much litigation for ages f ollowing the passing of the Miranda verdict. Interrogation In the event of an interrogation, police officers have the obligation to inform the suspect of principles, ask them whether they would need a drink. This process of communication is not termed as cross-examination and does not under whatsoever circumstance breach the suspects rights, even though they have alluded that they are not ready to communicate in the absentia of the attorney. Custody If the culprit has been arrested, theyre essentially in custody, although many interrogation scenarios dont fall rather so precisely one edge of the flank or the subsequent. Irrespective of whether a suspect is believed to be in custody is a question of an objective trial: whether or not a rational person would think that the law enforcement personnel had relayed that the suspect was not at liberty to leave. Intelligent Waiver Immediately a suspect behind bars is informed of the Miranda Warnings, they are at liberty to talk with police officers or not. Nonetheless, the law enforcers have no right to re-Mirandize the defendant at every twist, and if they come back moments later after initial talks and asserts theyre ready to discuss, new warnings are advisable although not needed. In the same vein, the suspect can retract their mind once they started the discussion. At every phase, they retain the right to discontinue the cross-examination and request legal representatives, (Nolan, 2008). While many people believe that if they are not read the Miranda Warning that their charges will be summarily dismissed by the courts, this is not necessarily true, (Geddes, 2007). The Miranda Warning is about protecting your rights as far as police interrogation or questioning against your will. Historically there was concern that police were too intimidating in their questioning and frightened suspects into confessing a c rime they may not have committed or pressured them into giving evidence against themselves. Many people mistakenly believe that if they speak willingly to police officers, telling all freely, and they have not been Mirandized before they speak, the police will not be able to use that confession at a trial. Dont bank on it: if you confess to a crime or speak willingly without being Mirandized, that information may be presented at a trial. The police could prove that they would have discovered this evidence without your assistance, which allows them to use the information. Q 7 A search transpires when a state worker or agent contravenes a logical anticipation of confidentiality. A seizure is the obstruction with a persons ownership interest in asset. The propertys proprietor must have had a logical anticipation of confidentiality in the items held. An individual is held when police officers apply physical coercion to restrain an individual if a logical person in a comparable circumstance would not feel gratis to leave. The exclusion on irrational searches and seizures restricts the actions police officers may assume when doing a felonious cross-examination; nevertheless, the ban also bars irrational searches and apprehensions in the civil lawsuit framework. Policing is required to carry out a search in the event that a personal suspicion informs the search. The 4th Amendment disallows holistic searches, unless in strange conditions, place the public under threat, (Russell et al, 2005). Under the Plain View, police officer that have the right to be in the position to hold the perception are liable to seizure that is not warranted, and if a warrant is feasible, then the officer has to substantiate a valid argument. This view is restricted, nevertheless, by the likely cause demands: the personnel must have probable cause to believe that objects in plain standpoint are illegal items prior to a search or a seizure. The Court has posited from the plain stance cannon to assert that once law enforcers have legitimately observed illegal items, the owners confidentiality interest in that object is lost, and law enforcers are more likely to reseal an item, track its path by way of a monitored delivery, and attack and re-open the item without necessarily having a warrant, (Geddes, 2007). For consent searches, the 4th Amendment liberties, like other constitution liberties, may be waived and one might consent to cross examine of their person or property by personnel who have not informed with the Amendment. The Court has nevertheless, asserted that the burden is on the prosecution to guarantee the willingness of the approval and consciousness of the right of choice. Buy custom Criminal Law essay

Shelly Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Shelly - Essay Example This story can be seen as an allegory about the theme nature versus nurture. It shows that even monsters are capable of love and even a harmless creature can be turned into a monster, given the treatment that he or she receives from his or her creator or the people around him or her. To give more clarity to the theme, nature versus nurture, in Frankenstein, Shelly has used a set of verbal imagery including the images of fire, light, gloomy weather, remote settings, violence and finally death. The way in which the narrator in the story get cast away from mythical stories, which are very close to nature and get drawn towards science which was in some way opposite to nature, is by watching a lightning burning down a tree to ashes (Shelly, 56-58). Here, the light and fire is metaphoric of the transformation of the author from being a person fascinated by nature into someone who has the confidence to command nature, who believes in nurture rather than nature. And when Frankenstein narrate s his own inner story to his creator, the imagery of fire is repeated and the reader hears the monster wondering about the nature of fire in the following words: I found a fire†¦and was overcome with delight at the warmth I experienced from it. In my joy, I thrust my hand into the live embers, but quickly drew it out again with a cry of pain. How strange, I thought, that the same cause should produce such opposite effects (Shelley, 218). This is a profound depiction of the basic contradiction involved within the evil-good duo, which can also be interpreted as a reflection of nature- nurture duality as well. Because in nature there is no evil or good as such and they exist only within a frame created by human beings. So it can be argued that evil is an after-effect of nurture. And the fire teaches that simple lesson to the monster who is just like a new born baby unaware of good and evil, and who is just learning to tread the earth and the landscape of humanity. Throughout the s tory, people are seen seeking refuge around a wood fire to talk, to understand the contradictions of life better (Shelley, 257). Similarly, there is also mention of the â€Å"feverish fire† glimmering in the eyes of Frankenstein even when his health is failing him (Shelley, 254). Here, fire is the life force, the passion that keeps one alive. Fire is the boundary between life and death, between nature and nurture. In the same way, light is used as an imagery that represents knowledge- the point at which humans depart from nature and enters the realm of nurture. This is why Frankenstein is seen observing that â€Å"I began also to observe, with greater accuracy, the forms that surrounded me, and to perceive the boundaries of the radiant roof of light which canopied me† (Shelly, 217). Again the reference to knowledge is made when narrator says, â€Å"as exemplified in the change from life to death, and death to life, until from the midst of this darkness a sudden light broke in upon me† (Shelly, 84). This was the moment of knowing the secret of life. This was the point of transition from simply living the nature to nurturing life. But the same light becomes â€Å"oppressive† for Frankenstein because it is the growing existential knowledge that becomes an unbearable curse for him (Shelly, 214). And this is why, towards the

Peasantry is present in both novels, Fathers and Sons and The House of Essay

Peasantry is present in both novels, Fathers and Sons and The House of the Spirits. Explain the use of Peasants and their role i - Essay Example One of the main characters of the novel, Esteban Garcia, belongs to the family who represent the peasant class in the novel. The peasants, in this novel, can join the police force or the army and gain access to education and a higher class status. The antagonism between the two classes occurs due to the fact that the aristocrats own the lands while the peasants work on them. The discord between them intensifies when the upper class flourishes and the lower class fails to prosper. Several different approaches are represented towards the inequality. Esteban Garcia believes in the conventional view i.e. the peasants are a dignified class and should not strive to achieve the status of the higher class. They should be contented with whatever they have been provided with. On the other hand, another member of the same family, Pedro Tercero Garcia, represents the revolutionary peasants who want to change their situation. The peasants are also supported by the Trueba women. The novel starts a nd ends with a narration that refers directly to Clara and her use of journals. The words used by the narrator were written by Isabel Allende. Special attention has been given to the various ways in which each woman learn how to write. Clara and Alba first get a hang at writing and then learn how to make use of that writing. Writing testifies the events that they had witnessed on both personal and political level. The primary purpose of such a testimony being to broadcast these events to a wider audience so that they are able to draw lessons and learn from the events. At the personal level, Alba and her relatives were able to put together their family progeny and history on the basis of Clara's writings. Alba talks about military rule, the military regime etc at the political levels. Alba's writings reflect the events that place at Isabel's house in Chile during her life. Fate keeps playing its game in The House of the Spirits. The events had been thematized in Clara's clairvoyance that helped her understand the fate of people and to predict future. The plot has been structured such that it revolves around the encounters of the members of the del Valle-Trueba family and the Garcia family with each other. most of the young couples in the novels met each other when they were young and ultimately realized that they are meant for each other years later. The novel takes a slow and steady pace throughout the course of its story depiction and narration. Love returned and found its way through a rare combination of chance and design. The same was the case with most other relations in the novel including friendships and debts. Most turning points in the show were a matter of chance and the game of destiny. They did not follow a steady course of actions. The actions took place by chance. every character's fate in the novel was a culmination of his actions, whether great and small. This is analogous to the fate of country being determined by the roles played by forces of nature. (rags) .Fathers and Sons Ivan Turgenev novel, Fathers and Sons, is realistically set in a Russian countryside where Turgenev captures the situation of some families during the social upheaval in Russian history. Tsar Alexander II officially emancipated the serfs in 1861 after a movement which had been growing since 1859. Nikolai Petrovic forfeits his power and frees the serfs but he faces problems in maintaining order over them now. The Russian upheaval results in the