Causality and logical fallacieis in old wives' tales and old farmer's Essay

Causality and logical fallacieis in old wives tales and old farmers tales (tales are given) - Essay Exampley arise because of observing some instances where they became true, so people shared these stories as facts, and these beliefs are subsequently passed on to others. The flaws in the logical reasoning understructure these tales are first, non sequitur because conclusions about these superstitions do non necessarily adopt from the premises second, hasty generalization because anecdotal evidence does not support the remote validity of superstitions third, confusing cause and effect because factors that happen unitedly are not always related as cause and effect and fourth, appeal to fear because grim cats are related to witchcraft and demons.The old wives tale about pregnant women shows non sequitur because the effect of having a kid who becomes a musician does not always follow from the practice of listening to music art object pregnant. The admit source of this superstit ion is not well-documented, although some of these stories are likely to come from European countries that are social of listening to classical music in the past. These mothers might have been incidentally listening to music while pregnant, so when their children became musicians, they immediately attributed the latters musician skills to their pregnancy habits. Nevertheless, even if it was true for some mothers, it does not follow, which is non sequitur, that every mother who follows the same practice will also have children with musical skills. Believing in this relationship results to another fallacy called hasty generalization. Even if some pregnant mothers attest that they listened to music regularly while pregnant, and that this practice provided musical skills to their children, their small sampling cannot be applied to the entire population of mothers who follow the same habit. It will be hasty generalization to assume that the practice of a small mathematical group gener ates effects that are applicable for the whole population. Anecdotal evidence is not enough to prove the external validity of the